A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among future neighbours over the development of the wall at a coastal site in a north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide awareness following an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family household at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental concerns, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a very publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development works at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, request to construct their family residence. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, exactly where advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established citizens. In accordance with the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being manufactured by their prospective neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted under scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing permission by developing a wall outside of the boundaries in their site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, especially in a very sensitive coastal surroundings including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their scheduling permission, and say the wall, that's partly built, is in the correct placement. Their lawful crew has characterised the action being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The pair accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, where by views of the sea are equally highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the site, In line with sworn evidence referenced while in the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded through waistline-large h2o during a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments, an image which has due to the fact come to be emblematic in the intensity of the dispute. These actions were not simply symbolic; they have been intended to Assemble visual evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Moments documented, describing how the two Adult men entered the drinking water through critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the website turned Just about the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that such actions were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into an area afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being lined intimately because of the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court heard even further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders should be granted to halt building pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential moment inside the lawful timeline.
With the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement above boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as built, goes outside René Collier and Paul Feely of what was permitted and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, is referred to as meticulous in his examination of preparing documents, maps, and conditions attached towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their motion is enthusiastic by concern for environmental defense and adherence to arranging legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public watch, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their very long-standing relationship to the region as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply just attempting to establish a relatives residence in accordance With all the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches on a Distinctive Place of Conservation and say that each one works have been performed determined by Experienced advice and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with coming into The ocean all through a storm, will not alter the underlying points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how planning disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute more than construction of wall at coastal internet site has become a shorthand description for your condition that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become far more contentious.
The Irish Occasions short article about René Collier noted the businessman experienced Beforehand been associated with neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting each the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be uncertain. The court should decide if the wall as created complies with setting up authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Space of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and arranging situations. But the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who have to Reside together with one another extended after the authorized expenditures are actually compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development will work at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase beyond that address. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the importance of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when basic difficulties like environmental defense and assets rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a location of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful issues. Regardless of whether it'll ultimately be altered, eradicated, or accomplished as prepared will depend on the court docket’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable continue on to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to The most intently viewed preparing disputes in north Dublin lately.